Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Sam James <sam@g.o>, "Jannik Glückert" <jannik.glueckert@×××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>, toolchain@g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] flag-o-matic.eclass: have is-flagq respect succeeding -fno-flag | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:52:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJ0EP418awMy=E7tRqjM6Y3h4GEcKRL0xy-w2rt-WE_yFGkW1A@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] flag-o-matic.eclass: have is-flagq respect succeeding -fno-flag by Sam James |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:04 AM Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > From: Jannik Glückert <jannik.glueckert@×××××.com> |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Handle bits like -flto -fno-lto. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Why would we care about this? If we just strip the -flto out, that |
| 8 | leaves -fno-lto and the result is the same. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | What am I missing? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] flag-o-matic.eclass: have is-flagq respect succeeding -fno-flag | "Jannik Glückert" <jannik.glueckert@×××××.com> |