Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: sunrise@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:56:06
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project by Dirkjan Ochtman
1 On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:44:42AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
2 > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3 > > Your thoughts?
4 > I would agree that proxy-maint and GH pull requests are better than
5 > sunrise, and so we should probably sunset (pun intended) the latter.
6 The new method is better, but that doesn't cover what to do with the
7 500+ packages in sunrise.
9 I have found them useful in the past, when I suddenly had a need for
10 something, and there was an ebuild in sunrise that I could adopt into
11 the tree.
13 --
14 Robin Hugh Johnson
15 Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer
16 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
17 GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
18 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com>