Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:46:20
Message-Id: 515570F2.2030902@flameeyes.eu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt by Samuli Suominen
1 On 29/03/2013 11:26, Samuli Suominen wrote:
2 > With the new predictable network interface naming scheme which upstream enabled
3 > by default you don't have to rename anymore because the names will be static
4 > and not randomly rename when you, for example, upgrade the kernel. This can be
5 > very important aspect, for example, security in mind.
6
7 You do know this is false, right? The names are supposed to be
8 predictable, not persistent. If you do happen to MOVE your network card
9 because the new videocard you add to your system does not fit otherwise,
10 the name _will_ change.
11
12 > If /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules is a empty file, or if it's a
13 > symlink to /dev/null, the new names will be disabled and kernel will do
14 > all the interface naming, which will be random.
15
16 Avoid spreading FUD about naming being random. Thanks.
17
18 --
19 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
20 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Replies