| 1 |
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 19:42 +0000, Robin H. Johnson escribió: |
| 2 |
> As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to |
| 3 |
> go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as |
| 4 |
> static builds. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
But, what is requiring it? |
| 8 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478110#c33 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Looks like the static stuff isn't needed (that would allow us to not |
| 11 |
need to keep static stuff in sys-apps/udev) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:07:39PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 14 |
> > El mar, 30-07-2013 a las 11:42 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
| 15 |
> > > On 29/07/13 23:57, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 16 |
> > > > Hello |
| 17 |
> > > > |
| 18 |
> > > > As discussed at: |
| 19 |
> > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478476 |
| 20 |
> > > > |
| 21 |
> > > > Upstream is dropping static libs from udev and, then, sys-apps/udev is |
| 22 |
> > > > currently reverting that commit downstream (even if upstream says some |
| 23 |
> > > > problems could appear in the future as nobody is taking care of static |
| 24 |
> > > > stuff there). |
| 25 |
> > > > |
| 26 |
> > > > Grepping in the tree, looks like only some old genkernel versions are |
| 27 |
> > > > depending on it. Apart of that, what is requiring static libs in |
| 28 |
> > > > cryptsetup and lvm2? |
| 29 |
> > > > |
| 30 |
> > > > Thanks a lot |
| 31 |
> > > > |
| 32 |
> > > |
| 33 |
> > > cryptsetup upstream installed minimal Gentoo setup and tested our |
| 34 |
> > > handling of 'static' and was disappointed finding them broken |
| 35 |
> > > |
| 36 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438998 - cryptsetup static+pcre |
| 37 |
> > > fails |
| 38 |
> > > |
| 39 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468400 - cryptsetup |
| 40 |
> > > static+selinux fails |
| 41 |
> > > |
| 42 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472692 - cryptsetup static+ssl fails |
| 43 |
> > > |
| 44 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462908 - lvm2 static-libs |
| 45 |
> > > missing library |
| 46 |
> > > |
| 47 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467204 - lvm2 static USE flag |
| 48 |
> > > missing proper description, yes this is minor |
| 49 |
> > > |
| 50 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370217 - lvm2 fails to build due |
| 51 |
> > > to missing -lrt, likely related to linking against libudev, yes the |
| 52 |
> > > feature we are discussing to be dropped has been completely broken for ages |
| 53 |
> > > |
| 54 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439414 - lvm2 static+selinux fails |
| 55 |
> > > |
| 56 |
> > > So we are not talking about removing anything that works, but something |
| 57 |
> > > users get hit by reading outdated guides that instruct them to enable |
| 58 |
> > > USE=static |
| 59 |
> > > |
| 60 |
> > > +1 for punting broken features |
| 61 |
> > > |
| 62 |
> > > |
| 63 |
> > |
| 64 |
> > We should drop that broken support I guess, but will CC its maintainers |
| 65 |
> > here too (they are CCed in bug report already) |
| 66 |
> > |
| 67 |
> |
Archives