Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process | ||
| Date: | Tue, 03 Jan 2017 23:49:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_=eMYcMpFm2DcjAwTLY_d4pr1c=yQMF17Ur0A4JcpKwdQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process by Kent Fredric |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > In that, by making the submitter resolve it all, its either "good" or "bad" |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Instead of leaving the person doing the testing in a confused state about which packages |
| 6 | > are expected to be used. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Well, assuming that a human is actually the one figuring it out. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | But, yes, I agree with your general point the way we do things today... |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Rich |