| 1 |
On Monday 27 February 2006 11:47, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:53:20 -0800 Donnie Berkholz |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > | The maintainer should be the absolute authority over his/her packages, |
| 7 |
> > | and only the council should be able to overrule maintainer decisions |
| 8 |
> > | in the case of disagreement between the maintainer and anybody else. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > So if the maintainer sticks SANDBOX_DISABLE="1" rm -fr / in global scope |
| 11 |
> > and refuses to move it, QA will have to get council approval to fix it? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Use some common sense when showing an example please. We all know that |
| 14 |
> something that stupid needs to be delt with quickly. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
we've had at least one ebuild do stuff in /tmp in global scope ... of course |
| 17 |
that was a mistake the dev felt really bad about and it was fixed once |
| 18 |
noticed, so not sure this is an appropriate example ;) |
| 19 |
-mike |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives