| 1 |
Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 2 |
> I don't understand half of what you said. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> You are saying that PMS is a sub-project of QA? Is the PMS spec hosted |
| 5 |
> on Gentoo infrastructure? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> From all I have read, PMS is meant to define the functionality of |
| 8 |
> Paludis itself, which is not a Gentoo project. Because of this, PMS |
| 9 |
> can't be considered a Gentoo project. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
That may be what it's meant to do now, but that was not the original purpose. It |
| 12 |
was originally to be a written specification of EAPI=0, which is essentially |
| 13 |
portage's current functionality. It's only later that the whole PMS == Paludis |
| 14 |
thing came about. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives