| 1 |
On 10:33 Sun 10 May , William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> All, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm considering changing the pybugz command syntax to be something |
| 5 |
> similar to the way portage's syntax works. For example, "pybugz get" |
| 6 |
> would become "pybugz --get", "post" would become "--post", etc to |
| 7 |
> simplify the command line parsing code. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Does anyone have an objection to something like this? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I rather like it as is, because pybugz has distinct "modes" with other |
| 12 |
options that are only valid in specific modes. I don't really find it |
| 13 |
user-friendly to both specify a mode of operation and options to that |
| 14 |
mode with the same syntax. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Thanks, |
| 18 |
Donnie |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 21 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 22 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives