From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? |
Date: | Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:12:52 |
Message-Id: | 21244.57571.465017.684762@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de |
1 | When rewriting the script scanning for binary files in the Portage |
2 | tree [1], I noticed that there are some 25 XPM and SVG image files, |
3 | with sizes up to 13 kB. |
4 | |
5 | For the time being, I've added exceptions for MIME types image/svg+xml |
6 | and image/x-xpmi [2], but I think it would be better to clarify our |
7 | policy on this. The devmanual currently says: |
8 | |
9 | | Things that do not belong in the tree: |
10 | | * Large patches |
11 | | * Non-text files |
12 | | * Photos of teletubbies |
13 | | * Files whose name starts with a dot |
14 | |
15 | Should we allow pictures if the image file format is a text file? |
16 | |
17 | Ulrich |
18 | |
19 | [1] http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/find-binary-files.txt |
20 | [2] http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/qa-scripts.git;a=blob;f=find-binary-files.sh;hb=HEAD |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <zx2c4@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? | Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow picture files in the Portage tree? | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |