| 1 |
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:02:26PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 06:04:03 -0500 Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | You know apple ain't going to support the broken mess that results, |
| 5 |
> | and nor will we most likely. That is why we can't go replacing |
| 6 |
> | whatever we label as broken[1] on *any* system where portage is |
| 7 |
> | secondary. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Then we can't support portage as a secondary package manager. |
| 10 |
Well, since you say so... :P |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
One note, stating that gentoo osx no longer functions with portage as |
| 13 |
a secondary pkg manager still doesn't do jack for addressing the 10.3 |
| 14 |
-> 10.4 issue... so really, it still is secondary. |
| 15 |
~brian |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives