Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome 2.4
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:20:57
Message-Id: 20030913122148.505844f5.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome 2.4 by Lisa Seelye
1 begin quote
2 On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:00:15 -0400
3 Lisa Seelye <lisa@g.o> wrote:
4
5 > On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 21:29, Spider wrote:
6 > > Well,
7 > > after some times hard work it is finally time to unmask Gnome 2.4
8 > > for
9 > > ~testing. Thanks to all of the Gnome team, foser, Obz and liquidx
10 > > for
11 > > their great work here.
12 >
13 > What is the solution to cure blocked packages, such as:
14 > [blocks B ] <gnome-extra/gnome-utils-2.3 (from pkg
15 > gnome-extra/gucharmap-1.0.0)
16 > [blocks B ] gnome-base/bonobo-activation (from pkg
17 > gnome-base/libbonobo-2.4.0
18 >
19 > Just unemerge them (like with the Perl move)?
20 >
21
22 Yeah, removing them is the way. Basically bonobo-activation was
23 included in libbonobo, same for gucharmap / gnome-utils but in reverse.
24
25
26 //Spider
27
28
29 --
30 begin .signature
31 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
32 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
33 end