1 |
Dnia 2015-04-15, o godz. 11:59:12 |
2 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hi, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> why manifest signatures are still optional for repoman? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Repoman signatures are currently optional and this creates nasty |
9 |
> consequences: if signing errors occurs, repoman still proceeds :/ |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I just had a phone call during repoman commit and was not able to |
12 |
> type my password. Due to gpg-agent timeout repoman completed commit |
13 |
> without a signature :( Should signatures be mandatory, repoman will |
14 |
> bail out on such conditions and devs can recommit again safely. |
15 |
|
16 |
This is problem with the CVS two-commit procedure. The only solution is |
17 |
to stop using CVS keywords which people don't want to do because THEY |
18 |
ARE SO VERY USEFUL. |
19 |
|
20 |
Or make repoman do first commit without Manifest, so instead of |
21 |
unsigned Manifest you'd have Manifest failure. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best regards, |
25 |
Michał Górny |