| 1 |
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:48:22 +0200 |
| 2 |
Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
[...] |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> However one concern with the virtual - if it is not interchangeable |
| 7 |
> (same library naming and ABI), then you have to rebuild things against |
| 8 |
> the other provider, and hopefully that can be set up to be more |
| 9 |
> automatic somehow; as the virtual will be satisfied with either of |
| 10 |
> them, so the user could exchange them without actual consumers linking |
| 11 |
> to it noticing. Some thoughts into that aspect, if even just some |
| 12 |
> warning to user, would be good. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Yes, the point is that is has same library name and ABI. |
| 15 |
Diffing installed headers show a very few symbols that are jack2 only, |
| 16 |
but packages needing them should depend on jack2 not the virtual, if |
| 17 |
there are any. |
Archives