1 |
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:10 AM Rolf Eike Beer <eike@×××××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Am Donnerstag, 12. September 2019, 18:38:30 CEST schrieb Rolf Eike Beer: |
4 |
> > Am Mittwoch, 11. September 2019, 00:54:39 CEST schrieb Michael Orlitzky: |
5 |
> > > On 9/10/19 4:25 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: |
6 |
> > > > I'm not entirely sure. It's what qmail always has done and what the |
7 |
> > > > eclass |
8 |
> > > > also did. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > This is suggested by the qmail documentation, |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > http://lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#create-users |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > ...but goes back to at least 1998, and likely earlier. I grepped the |
15 |
> > > source and don't see any obvious uses of $HOME. It was probably |
16 |
> > > suggested by DJB simply because it's a directory, and guaranteed to |
17 |
> > > exist on the various platforms that qmail supported at the time. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I have tested it without a home directory on 2 of my machines and it seems |
20 |
> > like it works fine. I have removed the home directory from the patches. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Ping? |
23 |
|
24 |
I still see ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/qmail/alias in acct-user/alias. |
25 |
|
26 |
Also, please do not add packages with no maintainer listed in |
27 |
metadata.xml. You can list yourself + proxy-maint at least. If you |
28 |
don't want to maintain them, you'll need to find someone else to do |
29 |
it. |