| 1 |
On 19 September 2014 10:13, Diamond <diamond@××××××.ru> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> P.S. As you see from description this option affects git performance. |
| 4 |
> So, we probably can arrive at a conclusion that git itself isn't good |
| 5 |
> at all for package management. Maybe there are better architectural |
| 6 |
> decisions for that. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Well. Yes. You're doing more because you want to get more out. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Or did you expect git to find potential copies from your whole repository |
| 12 |
for /no/ increase in performance cost? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That's why it defaults to off, for performance. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
( And because not everyone wants it on by default, because its somewhat a |
| 17 |
subjective aesthetic choice ) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Kent |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
*KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
Archives