1 |
Hanno Böck kirjoitti: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I noticed that the sqlite/sqlite3-useflags have no consistent meaning in the |
5 |
> tree. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> E.g. |
8 |
> - apr-util uses sqlite for sqlite-2.x support and sqlite3 for sqlite-3.x |
9 |
> support |
10 |
> - eix uses sqlite for sqlite-3.x support |
11 |
> Just the first examples I found, you can find countless for both of them in |
12 |
> the tree. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> We should imho decide if |
15 |
> a) sqlite means sqlite-2.x and sqlite3 means sqlite-3.x. |
16 |
> b) sqlite means enable sqlite-support always and sqlite+sqlite3 means if both |
17 |
> are available use sqlite-3.x instead of 2.x. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I don't care which one (or a completely different one), but I think it should |
20 |
> be made clear. At least I think the current behaviour in the tree doesn't |
21 |
> really make sense. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
We should remove 2.x from tree and use just sqlite. |
26 |
|
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
Petteri |