Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] eapi1 bug/pkgcore sucks thread [was EAPI-2 - Let's get it started]
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:16:54
Message-Id: 20080612021605.GA16944@seldon.metaweb.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started by David Leverton
1 On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 07:00:16PM +0100, David Leverton wrote:
2 > On Thursday 12 June 2008 02:46:03 Jim Ramsay wrote:
3 > > David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> wrote:
4 > > > Since at least one ebuild has already been modified specifically to
5 > > > work around the bug, I'd say it's pretty real.
6 > >
7 > > For those of us trying to play along at home, which one is this?
8 >
9 > http://tinyurl.com/4w4t69
10
11 Few things I'll note about this stupid, stupid mess- looks of it,
12 paludis folk have known about this for a while. In other words, folk
13 bitching about 'improving' QA intentionally sat on a bug for the sake
14 of mocking, bug which according to them ebuild devs have supposedly
15 worked around (yet to see it, but it's viable).
16
17 Useful to the whole, I'm sure. Same folk in control of PMS for those
18 playing the home game, politics over QA seemingly.
19
20 So what was the bug? Aside from having to walk the full eapi-1 bugs,
21 (ebuild referenced wasn't of use), majority of which actually *is*
22 tested in pkgcore (unlike portage which makes one wonder why pkgcore
23 is targeted), the fault is a simple defaulting of an unset var being
24 missed in implementing an undocumented spec (honestly, where is eapi1
25 spec?).
26
27 Literally, the BS of the last day all comes down to inability to state
28 the following:
29
30 === modified file 'pkgcore/bin/ebuild-env/ebuild-functions.sh'
31 --- pkgcore/bin/ebuild-env/ebuild-functions.sh 2007-11-12 01:17:24 +0000
32 +++ pkgcore/bin/ebuild-env/ebuild-functions.sh 2008-06-11 22:24:16 +0000
33 @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ src_compile
34 {
35 if [ "${EAPI:-0}" == 0 ] ; then
36 [ -x ./configure ] && econf
37 - elif [ -x ${ECONF_SOURCE}/configure ]; then
38 + elif [ -x ${ECONF_SOURCE:-.}/configure ]; then
39 econf || die "econf failed"
40 fi
41 if [ -f Makefile ] || [ -f GNUmakefile ] || [ -f makefile ]; then
42
43
44 Bit of a dumb bug, but it occurs unfortunately. And yes, bash bits
45 aren't currently tested since they're going to be completely ripped
46 out and replaced (in the process shifting where/how it's accessed).
47
48 Why the exherbo/paludis/PMS folk decided to go this route to report,
49 I'm not quite sure aside from assuming they're just griefers.
50
51 Regardless, fixed, released as 0.4.7.4, and in the tree.
52
53 Cheers
54 ~harring

Replies