| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:27 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/21/2015 02:04 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Right now there isn't even a functional games team to leave alone, and |
| 4 |
>> this isn't just about games. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Exactly. Start there, instead of having the council or QA impose games |
| 8 |
> policies. It's not their job. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Sure it is. These are tree consistency issues. And every project |
| 12 |
falls under the scope of the Council. That's what it is there for. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If there is something you want us to do to make the games team start |
| 15 |
working feel free to suggest it. We're all volunteers. You can't |
| 16 |
force people to join the games team. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Do you really want me to just join the games team myself, elect myself |
| 19 |
lead, and then impose sensible policies by fiat? I don't think that |
| 20 |
this is any better than having a discussion on the lists, and then |
| 21 |
having the Council take a vote. If somebody were stepping up and |
| 22 |
saying that they've got this one I'd be inclined to give them some |
| 23 |
runway to do it. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Rich |
Archives