1 |
That's awesome. Congrats. I've thought about doing the same thing, but all |
2 |
my Sun's are Sunstation 1's and 2's. So, I've not looked forward to |
3 |
compiling on them. I would email Daniel directly if I were you, concerning |
4 |
this. drobbins@g.o |
5 |
|
6 |
-Jared H. |
7 |
|
8 |
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 maarten@×××××××××××××××.be wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
> Hi, |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I've made a sparc32 port of Gentoo but I couldn't find any mention of |
13 |
> porting in the documentation. I'd like to know: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> 1) Are you 'friendly' towards ports? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> 2) Can I put the stage 1 tarball on your site? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> 3) Can you setup a new CVS tree so it can be accessed like: |
22 |
> SYNC="rsync://cvs.gentoo.org/gentoo-sparc-portage" |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> 3) The linux-headers packages contain 2 platform specific lines, can these |
26 |
> be wrapped using uname -m statements? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> cp -ax ${S}/include/asm-i386/* ${D}/usr/include/asm |
29 |
> [...] |
30 |
> cp "${ROOT}usr/src/linux-${KV}/arch/i386/defconfig" .config |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Shall I write a patch? |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> 4) I'm working on a 64-bit capable version using redhat's gcc |
36 |
> 2.96-20000731 for compiling sparc64 (the kernel prefers this). Would it be |
37 |
> possible to have this package stored on your site? There are >300 patches |
38 |
> that are applied to this tree so I'd rather not duplicate that work and |
39 |
> publish a patched tree immediately. This problem is going away anyway as |
40 |
> we'll reportely have decent sparc64 capability in the upcoming gcc 3.1 |
41 |
> tree. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Thanks! |
44 |
> maarten |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
> _______________________________________________ |
50 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
51 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
52 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
53 |
> |
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
Using the internet as it was originally intended... |
57 |
for the further research of pornography and pipebombs. |