Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:43:34
Message-Id: b38c6f4c0608080036o34dfca39pd55ff06f44c1aa0@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles by Zac Medico
1 Hi Zac,
2
3 On 8/8/06, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
5 > Hash: SHA1
6 >
7 > Hi everyone,
8 >
9 > I've written a patch [1] that implements support for use.force and package.use.force as originally described by Sven Wegener [2] over a year ago. Basically, this feature is the exact opposite of use.mask and package.use.mask. It forces USE flags to be enabled. The only way to disable these forced flags is to mask them via use.mask/package.use.mask or to "unforce" them in the profile stack. Users can unforce them via /etc/portage/profile/{use.force,package.use.force} in the usual "-flag" way.
10
11 Looks useful for arch teams. Doesn't seem very interesting for
12 package maintainers.
13
14 Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more useful to me.
15
16 Best regards,
17 Stu
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list