Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Implicit system dependency

[Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov]

В письме от Вт, 18 ноября 2014 03:28:08 пользователь Duncan написал:
> Tho I actually appreciate the "you get to keep the pieces" aspect as
> Unlike many distros, gentoo actually respects the user and their
> right to decide enough to give them the /power/ to break the system, if
> they "drink and emerge", or similar foolish things.  The guard rails are
> there and that's appreciated, but there's also unlocked gates (with clear
> warnings on them) thru those guard rails, because that's what gentoo is
> /about/.  Sure, people can and do go thru those gates from time to time,
> but it's their responsibility to be appropriately roped up if they do,
> and if they can't do that and end up falling off the gentoo cliff and
> landing on arch or fedora (or even osx or ms windows!) instead, well, it
> was probably for the best.
>
> So let's keep the warnings there as they do warn the unwary, but also the
> unlocked gates thru those default-use railings.  =:^)

That message should be sent as auto-reply to every 1.5 messages in this thread 
(and maybe in entire gentoo-dev, I think)! :)

-- 
Best regards,
mva