| 1 |
All I can say is wow :) |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Ive wanted this for a month now. I ask for it again and everyone steps |
| 4 |
up. Good job people. This is great. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
And yeah, /var/cache is where I think it should go. I also agree that |
| 7 |
gentoolkit would be the proper location for something like this, if they |
| 8 |
wanted it. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Gregg |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Alexander Gretencord wrote: |
| 13 |
>> On Friday 26 July 2002 22:50, Marko Mikulicic wrote: |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>>>What about /var/cache for script output ? |
| 17 |
>>>Or should I leave /root as default ? |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> /root is crap. /var is exactly for this type of data ... |
| 21 |
> I agree |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>>>I will make an ebuild for it, but I cannot provide hosting. Where |
| 26 |
>>> should I put it? |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> I think you should try to get this into official portage real soon :) |
| 30 |
>> Till then I could put it on my page (http://stud.upb.de/~q9tharkun/) |
| 31 |
>> where I already have my ebuilds (though most of them are now in |
| 32 |
>> portage anyway) |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> Just send me a tarball if you'd like me to put it up. |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> It came up to my mind that such a small tool doesn't like |
| 38 |
> to be alone, it needs some friends. I thought that the best place |
| 39 |
> for it would be "gentoolkit". |
| 40 |
> It is ok Karl? (I have already written the man page :-) |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Marko |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 46 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 47 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 48 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives