Archives
Archives
| From: | Christel Dahlskjaer <christel@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:10:39 |
| Message-Id: | 1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich |
| 1 | It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being |
| 2 | dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of |
| 3 | keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how |
| 4 | about the following addition to the Social Contract? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | <heading>We will be run by the Development Community</> |
| 7 | Gentoo will be run by the development community. We will never allow |
| 8 | ourselves to be reliant upon a single sponsor or corporation. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | I remain, Sir, your most humble and obedient servant, |
| 13 | Christel - conventionally stuck in the 1920s |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract | Mike Kelly <pioto@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed addition to the Social Contract | Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract | "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |