Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:47:23
Message-Id: 200309282347.35615.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS by Mike Frysinger
1 On Tuesday 23 September 2003 22:37, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > > 4)
3 > > /usr/games should be a directory for binaries, not subtree, (i. e.
4 > > /usr/games/bin -> /usr/games, /usr/games/lib -> /usr/lib,
5 > > /usr/games/share -> /usr/share/games).
6 >
7 > hmm the games setup (can be found in games.eclass) was created based upon
8 > (well what i thought was ...) FHS compliance ... i'll go back and review
9 > this again ...
10 > if you want to see the current design, just read the games.eclass.
11
12 ok i reviewed FHS and decided to not change the way Gentoo does it.
13 to summarize, Gentoo puts binaries in /usr/games/bin and gaming related
14 libraries in /usr/games/lib ... i dont know where you're getting this /usr/
15 games/share since no package should be using this ...
16 i dont like placing gaming related libraries into /usr/lib since nothing else
17 in the system cares about games ...
18
19 in my mind it makes people's lives easier if they want to restrict games ...
20 they only have to look at /usr/games/ and /usr/share/games/ rather than
21 trying to track down specific files/directories in a huge list in /usr/lib/
22 -mike

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>