| 1 |
> On 20 Jul 2021, at 20:57, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Sam James wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> -Revision: 1 |
| 6 |
>> +Revision: 2 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Is this supposed to be read again by users? Then it should be a new news |
| 9 |
> item (with updated date in filename) and the old item should be deleted. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Sure, I'll do that. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> +Please note that if you last changed your password before ~2008, |
| 14 |
>> +it may using md5crypt or similar other weak mechanisms in /etc/shadow; |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This should be "may be using" or "may use" I think. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> s/similar other/similar/ |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks! |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
>> +a bug in PAM [0][1] may mean that you were unable to login. We recommend |
| 24 |
>> +using `passwd` to change/refresh your passwrd so it is using modern |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> s/passwrd/password/ |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Also, this is read as plain text, so maybe use double quotes instead of |
| 29 |
> accents graves. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Sure. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
>> +methods. A new version of PAM has been added to the tree to resolve this issue. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Cheers for the review, |
| 37 |
sam |
Archives