Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category | ||
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:10:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130117170819.19eaaaef@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category by James Cloos |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:05:03 -0500 |
| 2 | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > >>>>> "CM" == Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> writes: |
| 4 | > CM> Which is a good thing, since it will force people to stop making |
| 5 | > CM> incorrect assumptions. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > No, its a bad thing because it makes it harder to grep out the non |
| 8 | > category dirs. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | That's what's known as "doing it wrong". You should be querying your |
| 11 | package mangler for a list of categories, not doing an 'ls'. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> |