| 1 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 2 |
> AND is already the implicit combinator. Thus simply listing both these |
| 3 |
> atoms |
| 4 |
> gives what you want: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > =some-cat/foo-4.0 |
| 7 |
> <some-cat/foo-4.3 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Still a special syntax for ranges seems like a good idea. If only portage |
| 10 |
> would not upgrade past such specifications (and downgrade the next time). |
| 11 |
Sorry; I made a mistake on my second example. Meant to say |
| 12 |
( && >=some-cat/foo-4.1 <some-cat/foo-4.3 ) |
| 13 |
to imply that there were versions *less* than 4.1 that should not be |
| 14 |
picked up. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm not hung up *at all* on the syntax, though, and just modeled my |
| 17 |
example after the existing OR syntax. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- John |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives