| 1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Wasn't ALLARCHES supposed to be applied only if a previous version had |
| 4 |
> a stable keyword on the arch in question? I.e. if it has been tested |
| 5 |
> by arch team at least once? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Yes, but the same would apply to most of the elisp code that is shipped |
| 8 |
with app-editors/emacs itself, for which I doubt that it gets large |
| 9 |
coverage in arch testing. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Either these things are arch independent, then I don't see why they |
| 12 |
couldn't have the same keywords as emacs itself. Or they are not, |
| 13 |
then they shouldn't have the allarches label in the first place. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Ulrich |
Archives