Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:07:54
Message-Id: 426D9434.9090407@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating sys-power/speedfreq by Jason Stubbs
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Jason Stubbs wrote:
5 > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 06:57, Alin Nastac wrote:
6 >
7 >>Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
8 >>
9 >>>On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 23:34 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
10 >>>
11 >>>>If it is superseded by cpufreqd, why not removing it from the tree and
12 >>>>append "move sys-power/speedfreq sys-power/cpufreqd" line in
13 >>>>updates/2Q-2005?
14 >>>
15 >>>Because 'move' is for renaming packages?
16 >>
17 >>we used move to overwrite zebra with quagga. see bug 75766.
18 >
19 >
20 > In that case, quagga was a fork of zebra that used the same versioning.
21 > cpufreqd has nothing to do with speedfeq.
22
23 Yeah, I can attest for moves to packages that already exist doing very
24 strange things. And if speedfreq ever gets picked up again, things
25 really start to get weird.
26 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
28 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
29
30 iD8DBQFCbZQ0XVaO67S1rtsRAuEzAKDeA6GaLfetawGsHPeTU30Txurc2QCfaACF
31 hlfGeqC5EjhGWMvunonoBOo=
32 =cY+x
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list