Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Evans <grknight@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-db/mysql/
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:32:53
Message-Id: 571519DC.7020305@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-db/mysql/ by "Michał Górny"
1 On 4/18/2016 11:34 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:33 +0000 (UTC)
3 > "Patrice Clement" <monsieurp@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> commit: 912a9f1e2ed5717a7669861b4978dfaf868c5ae7
6 >> Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
7 >> AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:33:40 2016 +0000
8 >> Commit: Patrice Clement <monsieurp <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
9 >> CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:57:59 2016 +0000
10 >> URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=912a9f1e
11 >>
12 >> dev-db/mysql: Fix metadata.xml file.
13 >>
14 >> Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
15 >>
16 >> dev-db/mysql/metadata.xml | 4 ++--
17 >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
18 >>
19 >> diff --git a/dev-db/mysql/metadata.xml b/dev-db/mysql/metadata.xml
20 >> index 422ac80..538f21e 100644
21 >> --- a/dev-db/mysql/metadata.xml
22 >> +++ b/dev-db/mysql/metadata.xml
23 >> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
24 >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
25 >> <!DOCTYPE pkgmetadata SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd">
26 >> <pkgmetadata>
27 >> -<maintainer restrict="dev-db/mysql[libressl]" type="person">
28
29 Why was the restrict removed?
30
31 GLEP 67 does not remove the restrictions either:
32
33 "The package metadata description is fully self-sufficient for bug
34 assignment. The order in which <maintainer/> elements occur (after
35 applying restrictions) indicates the chain of responsibility. A bug is
36 assigned to the first maintainer, while all the remaining maintainers
37 are CC-ed."
38
39 The point of this entry is to assign bugs when a certain condition
40 exists. The person/project is not responsible otherwise.
41
42 Brian

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies