Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for updates to dodoc
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:16:51
Message-Id: 20010924131651.F14883@cvs.gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for updates to dodoc by Karl Trygve Kalleberg
1 On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:35:11PM +0200, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
2
3 > The dodoc command in ebuilds should handle HTML files a lot better than it
4 > does now. Instead of naively compressing html files, they should be put
5 > /usr/share/doc/${P}/html instead. This would be a very simple fix, if it
6 > wasn't for the fact that we sometimes want to copy entire HTML-trees with
7 > image files and all (such as the documentation for python or qt).
8
9 I'm ok with doing this; would you be willing to improve dodoc and post your
10 improvements here? As long as they are sane, I doubt anyone will complain
11 and I'll roll them into the next version of Portage.
12
13 Best Regards,
14
15 --
16 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
17 Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org
18 Gentoo Technologies, Inc.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for updates to dodoc Morgan Christiansson <sft3905@××××××××××××.se>