1 |
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 09:46:52 Alex Alexander wrote: |
2 |
> If the community feels their choice, albeit not perfect, will help the |
3 |
> project, you have to respect that. That is, if you want to be part of the |
4 |
> community :) |
5 |
|
6 |
I see your point to some extent, but the concern is that such decisions might |
7 |
sometimes get made according to who's best at ignoring technical objections |
8 |
rather than what's the best thing to do. It has happened before, although in |
9 |
that case the change was made first, and then when the issue was brought up |
10 |
it got basically ignored for so long that it would be pointless to fix. It |
11 |
would be worrying if things like that started to happen more often. |
12 |
|
13 |
In any case, as mentioned in my other mail, if this particular change is done |
14 |
in a way that's optional for the user, I personally won't be /too/ upset if |
15 |
the rest of you want to do unspeakable things to your systems ;-). |