| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> So you propose we go through and change every package in the tree that |
| 3 |
> uses BSD or MIT (or GPL with the copyright disclaimer)? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
I propose that we decide on the correct way of doing things first, then |
| 7 |
decide a plan of action from that. And that includes an opinion from |
| 8 |
someone who knows what they're talking about, whether it be legal advice |
| 9 |
or a clarification to the point of the licenses directory. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
As Carsten pointed out one e-mail down in the thread, there's no real |
| 12 |
documentation about what licenses should be, so currently it's a "he |
| 13 |
said-she said" issue. |
| 14 |
> Every other package maintainer manages to get it right. That it's a bit |
| 15 |
> more work to do things properly is no excuse. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
You seem to contradict your above statement here. In any case, it's |
| 19 |
less work to just make almost everything MIT. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Joshua Baergen |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives