Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:39
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree by Brian Dolbec
1 On 08/15/2016 09:55 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
3 >
4 > For me IN_PROGRESS means the problem is being worked on, not that a fix
5 > has been posted/committed anywhere.
7 Indeed
9 > INVCS is once the fix has been
10 > committed to the source repo and not anything to do with an ebuild from
11 > the coders perspective. The problem is the overlap of bugzilla for
12 > both ebuild repositories and source repositories. So if there is any
13 > changes to be made to the different states possible... Just remember
14 > the the different perspectives and try to make it clear what they are
15 > for.
17 Yes, we're talking about the gentoo ebuild repository, source projects
18 etc should likely be an own product in bugzilla, it is not what we're
19 discussing in this context.
21 > Also, if a pkg is never stabilized... does that mean it's bugs
22 > can never be closed? So far in the discussion, that point has not been
24 No, you'd simply skip the stabilization step, as if the highest
25 visibility is testing/~arch to begin with there isn't any stable necessary
27 > brought up, but is very relevant to the discussion.
28 >
29 > /me mumbles about the extra bookeeping that work-flow will
30 > make...and subsequently put off and/or forget to do ;)
31 >
33 Better than developers marking it fixed without it hitting stable as too
34 many are doing today.
36 --
37 Kristian Fiskerstrand
38 OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://
39 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature