1 |
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 03:26:34 Tiziano Müller wrote: |
2 |
> Am Dienstag, den 10.02.2009, 02:02 +0200 schrieb Petteri Räty: |
3 |
> > Mike Frysinger wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Monday 09 February 2009 13:32:24 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
5 |
> > >> Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
6 |
> > >>> @mc.o (*1) we're currently discussing which screen library to keep. |
7 |
> > >>> Either ncurses or slang will be dropped (bundled slang will anyway) |
8 |
> > >>> Both have their pros and cons, so we haven't decided yet. |
9 |
> > >>> |
10 |
> > >>> What do you suggest, which screen library to keep ? |
11 |
> > >>> |
12 |
> > >>> BTW: 4.6.2 is soon coming (only 1 bug left) :) |
13 |
> > >> |
14 |
> > >> unicode? ( >=sys-libs/slang-2.1.3 ) |
15 |
> > >> !unicode? ( sys-libs/ncurses ) |
16 |
> > >> |
17 |
> > >> If Unicode isn't possible with ncurses, keep slang :P No Unicode |
18 |
> > >> support would be... not good. |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > that doesnt make any sense. both ncurses and slang work just fine with |
21 |
> > > and without unicode. i dont think he was asking about Gentoo anyways |
22 |
> > > ... he was asking about upstream mc. |
23 |
> > > |
24 |
> > > the proper string under Gentoo would be: |
25 |
> > > ncurses? ( |
26 |
> > > unicode? ( sys-libs/ncurses[unicode] ) |
27 |
> > > !unicode? ( sys-libs/ncurses ) |
28 |
> > > ) |
29 |
> > > !ncurses? ( slang? ( >=sys-libs/slang-2.1.3 ) ) |
30 |
> > > -mike |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > ncurses? ( sys-libs/ncurses[unicode?] ) |
33 |
> > !ncurses? ( slang? ( >=sys-libs/slang-2.1.3 ) ) |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Since you want always one of {slang,ncurses} you'll probably want |
36 |
> something like this: |
37 |
> |
38 |
> slang? ( >=sys-libs/slang-2.1.3 ) |
39 |
> !slang? ( sys-libs/ncurses[unicode?] ) |
40 |
> |
41 |
> and drop the ncurses USE-flag completely. Or set USE="+ncurses" and do |
42 |
> this: |
43 |
> ncurses? ( sys-libs/ncurses[unicode?] ) |
44 |
> !ncurses? ( >=sys-libs/slang-2.1.3 ) |
45 |
> |
46 |
> ... depends on what you want per default. |
47 |
|
48 |
pfft, real men dont need terminal libraries ;) |
49 |
-mike |