Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:24:48
Message-Id: 4A2141A2.5040007@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category? by "Tiziano Müller"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Tiziano Müller wrote:
5 > Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 17:00 -0700 schrieb Josh Saddler:
6 >> AllenJB wrote:
7 >>> I'd favor tags over increasing the category
8 >>> levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
9 >>> (tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways).
10 >> Heck yes! Tags are a good idea. The idea's been raised on -dev a few
11 >> times. I suppose they're not (yet) essential, but from a user point of
12 >> view, if the tools supported searching for tags buried in metadata.xml,
13 >> it would make life much, much nicer.
14 >
15 > And with the risk to repeat myself: herds can already been seen as tags.
16 > So, my proposal still stands: change the current herds into teams and
17 > write them in metadata.xml as such:
18 >
19 > <maintainer>
20 > <team>cpp</team>
21 > </maintainer>
22 >
23 > and then using <herd> as tags.
24
25 The largest issue I see with the idea of embedding tags in the tree is
26 that many users think that tags are great, but for them to be *really*
27 great, the tagging should be done outside of the tree to also allow them
28 to do the tagging.
29 Tags in the tree would be another framework at the hands of the devs and
30 would suffer from the same limitations as the tree - limited dev pool,
31 shortness of time, too many packages, etc. So at least some users would
32 like to have that framework open to them so they could contribute and
33 they hope provide a larger pool of people, with quite a bit of time in
34 their hands and more than willing to give back.
35 I like the idea of letting users join the tagging and think it's a way
36 of fostering the community belonging of Gentoo - besides I don't think
37 we need to "secure" the tags. I don't have any input on how to implement
38 that idea, though.
39
40
41 - --
42 Regards,
43
44 Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
45 Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE
46 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
47 Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
48 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
49
50 iEYEARECAAYFAkohQaIACgkQcAWygvVEyAIhUgCgkiL2Ljmc/mgd9/14bnLf5rWO
51 fWgAn0zwMWVlubF+/voflmamyKUymWTu
52 =Gy64
53 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----