| 1 |
El dom, 01-11-2015 a las 14:25 +0100, Patrick Lauer escribió: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 11/01/2015 01:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим <mva@×××.name |
| 5 |
> > > wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > And why don't just only generate them on rsync mirrors, but |
| 7 |
> > > remove them from git repo (like was planned initially, AFAIRC)? |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > That is in fact how it works. Or, at least how it is supposed to |
| 10 |
> > work. I don't use the rsync mirror, so I can't vouch for whether |
| 11 |
> > they're producing ChangeLogs. |
| 12 |
> Supposed to, but it doesn't |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Personally I'd just as soon see them go away entirely, but if |
| 15 |
> > somebody |
| 16 |
> > wants to make them work I won't stop them. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> I'd really not prefer to fly blind, ChangeLogs are awesome for users. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I am a user too. I really would like to know why something changed, |
| 21 |
> and |
| 22 |
> maybe who did it. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yeah, I also miss ChangeLogs many times when I want to review last |
| 26 |
changes without needing to go to open a browser instance and visit |
| 27 |
gitweb and search for the relevant package for the same purpose :| |
Archives