| 1 |
On 02/20/19 02:36, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 07:20 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 3 |
>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> # Don't install libtool archives (even for modules) |
| 7 |
>>> - prune_libtool_files --all |
| 8 |
>>> + find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete || die |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Maybe restrict removal to regular files, i.e. add "-type f"? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I suppose you should have spoken up when people started adopting that |
| 13 |
> 'find' line all over the place. Though I honestly doubt we're going to |
| 14 |
> see many packages installing '*.la' non-files. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
Just so we are all clear here: your argument is that more fully correct |
| 17 |
approaches should not be considered in the present and future because |
| 18 |
less fully correct approaches were implemented in the past? And, |
| 19 |
further, that since nothing matching a specific pattern happens to come |
| 20 |
to your mind at he moment, such things do not exist? Perhaps dialing |
| 21 |
back the rhetoric from 11 and considering feedback as an opportunity to |
| 22 |
improve existing code is called for in this case, among others. |
Archives