1 |
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 02:18, Luis F. Araujo wrote: |
2 |
> Hello everyone, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> A few days ago i glanced over package.mask , and i was surprised |
5 |
> about how many non-existent ebuild/packages entries are there. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> So, i wrote a script to try to get a list of those orphaned entries, |
8 |
> and it looks like there are more than 400 packages/ebuilds which are still |
9 |
> listed in p.m but that don't exist in the tree anymore. |
10 |
> (A bunch of them from the KDE herd btw) |
11 |
> |
12 |
I am not seeing the packages for the KDE herd - are you accounting for >=? KDE |
13 |
3.5 packages are just coming out of rcs, and alpha was long since removed but |
14 |
>=alpha1 is package.masked - I am also using this for digikam packages. It |
15 |
saves constantly altering the file. Please let me know if you spot any real |
16 |
orphan packages owned by KDE and I will look into it. |