1 |
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200 |
2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> # Gen 2 Developer <someone@g.o> (`date`) |
5 |
> # Masked for testing. |
6 |
> >=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver |
7 |
> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Please people, |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it. If you |
13 |
> find that you cannot commit an ebuild because of badly keyworded |
14 |
> dependencies, then drop the relevant keywords and file a bug report |
15 |
> with a KEYWORDREQ. |
16 |
|
17 |
Lest I forget, the exception being that a particular version should |
18 |
never ever go stable, in which case the masking reason should still be |
19 |
different. In that case you would still not mark it as "masked for |
20 |
testing" - what I wanted to clarify is that the mask reason isn't valid |
21 |
if you want stuff to get tested, as it prevents exactly that from |
22 |
happening. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Kind regards, |
26 |
JeR |