Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sam James <sam@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 07:37:07
Message-Id: F8F909D7-9E17-4867-B3AC-C56DA2712752@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. by Scott Ellis
1 > On 2 Jan 2022, at 00:03, Scott Ellis <scotte@××××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > Your `ipv6` USE flag hits home - I don't use IPv6, nor do I want to have IPv6 support built into things (just another potential "thing" that I have to secure, or errors/warnings I need to suppress since I run an IPv6-less kernel).
4 >
5 > If there needs to be a path to culling USE flags, perhaps looking to which flags actually cause packages to pull in additional dependencies (vs solely enable/disable a feature) would be a better place to start?
6 >
7
8 Yep, that's a good idea, but please do see my other comments on IPv6. USE=ipv6 actually has some problematic properties
9 aside from people wanting (or not wanting) IPv6.
10
11 One reason being that it's often not even a supported configuration upstream, but there's others I mentioned too.
12
13 Best,
14 sam

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature