| 1 |
On 07/02/2012 11:51 AM, Natanael Olaiz wrote: |
| 2 |
> It is LGPL, not GPL. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> diff -aru liblo_original/liblo-0.26.ebuild liblo/liblo-0.26.ebuild |
| 5 |
> --- liblo_original/liblo-0.26.ebuild 2011-09-12 20:38:28.000000000 +0200 |
| 6 |
> +++ liblo/liblo-0.26.ebuild 2012-07-02 10:43:29.000000000 +0200 |
| 7 |
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ |
| 8 |
> HOMEPAGE="http://plugin.org.uk/liblo" |
| 9 |
> SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz" |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> -LICENSE="GPL-2" |
| 12 |
> +LICENSE="LGPL-2.1" |
| 13 |
> SLOT="0" |
| 14 |
> KEYWORDS="amd64 ppc ppc64 x86 ~ppc-macos" |
| 15 |
> IUSE="doc ipv6 static-libs" |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Best regards, |
| 20 |
> Natanael. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Bugs should be reported to http://bugs.gentoo.org/ instead of here. |
| 23 |
Seriously. With that said, liblo is now fixed. |
Archives