| 1 |
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:51:46 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Robert Cernansky wrote: |
| 4 |
> > If I have some application that is not included in portage why |
| 5 |
> > I decide to make an ebuild? Because I hope that then it will be |
| 6 |
> > accepted and included to portage, so maintained by developers (big |
| 7 |
> > thanks for this). If I have to take care of package + ebuild + |
| 8 |
> > dependencies, I'll rather choose not to make an ebulid but compile |
| 9 |
> > package right from .tar.gz archive. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Many people disagree with you here, that's why overlays |
| 12 |
> exist. Somebody wants to use Portage to manage ebuilds that aren't |
| 13 |
> yet in the actual tree. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yes, it have sense for a larger set of packages (maybe) with |
| 16 |
complicated depenencies. But I'm talking about few single packages. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
OK, maybe I'd do some dirty ebuild but it will certainly not be ready |
| 19 |
for any publication. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Robert |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Robert Cernansky |
| 26 |
E-mail: hslists2@××××××.sk |
| 27 |
Jabber: HS@××××××.sk |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives