1 |
On 08/09/2015 04:43 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>>> I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it |
4 |
>>> "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if |
5 |
>>> you have a single-line commit message only. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that |
8 |
>> parse commit messages. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all |
11 |
> purposes, even for tools. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Also, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
That can be ambiguous, because it isn't clear whether you are |
17 |
referencing a gentoo bug. You can reference bugs from other bugtrackers |
18 |
as well. |