Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:19:24
Message-Id: 20130820181910.GA2204@linux1
1 All,
2
3 I'm not really sure what the answer to this problem is, so I want to
4 know what the group thinks about how we can handle it.
5
6 During the last release of OpenRC, I learned that people *do* run
7 production servers on ~arch. I asked about it and was told that the
8 reason for this is bitrot in the stable tree.
9
10 My question is, how can we improve our stabilization procedures/policies
11 so we can convince people not to run production servers on ~arch and
12 keep the stable tree more up to date?
13
14 Thanks,
15
16 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies "Paweł Hajdan
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies joshua saddler <nightmorph@g.o>