From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies |
Date: | Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:19:24 |
Message-Id: | 20130820181910.GA2204@linux1 |
1 | All, |
2 | |
3 | I'm not really sure what the answer to this problem is, so I want to |
4 | know what the group thinks about how we can handle it. |
5 | |
6 | During the last release of OpenRC, I learned that people *do* run |
7 | production servers on ~arch. I asked about it and was told that the |
8 | reason for this is bitrot in the stable tree. |
9 | |
10 | My question is, how can we improve our stabilization procedures/policies |
11 | so we can convince people not to run production servers on ~arch and |
12 | keep the stable tree more up to date? |
13 | |
14 | Thanks, |
15 | |
16 | William |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | "Paweł Hajdan |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | joshua saddler <nightmorph@g.o> |