| 1 |
On 12/19/2013 10:23 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday, 19 December 2013 16:00:13 CEST, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 3 |
>> A change in profiles? 14.0/* adds that to the default CXXFLAGS in |
| 4 |
>> base, new stage3's etc are all rolled with this. We recommend |
| 5 |
>> migration to 14.0 profile and have a check somewhere about |
| 6 |
>> "-std=c++11" missing from CXXFLAGS in case it's overridden in |
| 7 |
>> make.conf, so users put it in place? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Before you invest any more time in this, please understand that C++98 |
| 10 |
> and C++11 are source-incompatible. There is no way to expect that a |
| 11 |
> package builds fine when you throw -std=c++11 on it. And even if you |
| 12 |
> patched them all, you are breaking an unknown number of 3rd party |
| 13 |
> software over which you have exactly zero control. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Also note that as of gcc 4.8, the C++11 support is still labeled as |
| 16 |
> experimental and upstream developers announced they will introduce ABI |
| 17 |
> breaks in future. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> With kind regards, |
| 20 |
> Jan |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
I would look to gcc-4.9 for C++11. By that point many upstream |
| 24 |
providers will start to feel the pressure and patch for us. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 28 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 29 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 30 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 31 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives