| 1 |
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 23:51:42 -0700 "Daniel Robbins" |
| 2 |
<drobbins.daniel@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Gentoo projects are controlled by and generally run entirely by Gentoo |
| 4 |
> developers. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
No, they're controlled by whoever ends up writing code. If you think |
| 7 |
there's any control over, say, Portage, try getting an important feature |
| 8 |
request implemented. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> You are not a Gentoo developer, yet you define the |
| 11 |
> direction of PMS and Paludis. Therefore, PMS and Paludis can't be |
| 12 |
> considered official Gentoo projects. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
No-one is claiming that Paludis is an official Gentoo project. This |
| 15 |
discussion, however, is about PMS, not Paludis, and the only reason I |
| 16 |
can see to keep confusing them is political, so please stop doing that. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Nor do I define the direction of PMS. The requirements define its |
| 19 |
direction, and its contributors (the majority of which are Gentoo |
| 20 |
developers) do the writing. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Paludis does not have a Gentoo Foundation copyright, does PMS? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Not currently, but then neither does devmanual, so it's hardly unique |
| 25 |
in that respect. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 29 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 30 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 31 |
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |
Archives