| 1 |
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:51:47 -0400 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 4 |
| > From bind-9.3.2-r4.ebuild: |
| 5 |
| > |
| 6 |
| > Unless somebody can explain how this is valid, I'll go ahead and fix |
| 7 |
| > the bind ebuilds (where "fix" means "use -j1 unconditionally since |
| 8 |
| > the Makefiles aren't parallel safe"). |
| 9 |
| |
| 10 |
| If I'm using Autotools, aren't they smart enough (given that I |
| 11 |
| specify the proper headers, and source files and whatnot) to generate |
| 12 |
| parallel safe makefiles? Or is it a shot in the dark as to whether |
| 13 |
| it works or not? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You can quite easily screw up Makefile.am and generate unsafe code when |
| 16 |
using automake. It doesn't remove the need to know what you're doing. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 20 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
Archives