| 1 |
On 08/08/2010 03:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:15:04PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Why not just set some LDFLAGS that totally won't work (-Wl, taters) |
| 5 |
>> and then assume anything that actually compiles with those flags set |
| 6 |
>> does not respect LDFLAGS. Set that up on a tinderbox instead of |
| 7 |
>> making users do it. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> -A |
| 10 |
> Alec |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I was only talking about the *dev* profiles. As I said this will help |
| 13 |
> *developers* to track this problem and fix it before they commit their |
| 14 |
> packages to tree. Tinderbox will only catch packages that are already in the |
| 15 |
> tree. The main goal here is to fix these packages before they reach it |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I suggest making the dev profiles just pull in a binutils version that |
| 19 |
automatically enables the support (excluding profiles where binutils is |
| 20 |
not used). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Petteri |
Archives