Archives
Archives
| From: | Jon Portnoy <avenj@××××××××××××××.us> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS | ||
| Date: | Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:58:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140110165801.GA23683@eris.oppresses.us | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS by Igor |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:48:30PM +0400, Igor wrote: |
| 2 | > Do we have an agreement on this one from everyone of the list? |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Agreement on what, precisely...? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | In open source, better implementations usually gain more mindshare. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | If you think you can write one (and the project is interesting to you) |
| 10 | go forth and produce code! ;-) |